Bartender’s Lawsuit Tries to Block
D.C. Restaurant Server Wage Law


     A new lawsuit pending in D.C. Superior Court is running up against the D.C. Council’s effort to protect the wages of restaurant servers.
D.C. voters approved Initiative 77 in June that would require servers to be paid at least a minimum wage salary.
     The Initiative was supposed replace the tipped-service wage, which allowed restaurants to pay less than minimum wage if servers were allowed to keep all the tips they received.
     However, the D.C. Council repealed the Initiative despite a 56 percent approval margin by voters.
Council members said servers usually receive more money under tipped-service wages. Initiative 77 would cut their pay, the Council members said.
     The Council’s repeal now is running up against a court battle. Last week, a D.C. bartender filed a lawsuit in D.C. Superior Court that argues the D.C. Council failed to follow appropriate procedures in repealing Initiative 77.
     Congress was expected to give final approval to the repeal by next week. The lawsuit could delay the final approval.
     The bartender, Valerie Graham, is represented by Veritas, the law firm that advocates for the Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington, the city’s restaurant lobby.




Latest News

Arguments Start Next Week
On Military Transgender Ban


     Oral arguments are scheduled for next week in the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington on the Trump administration’s ban against transgender people serving in the military.
     A federal judge issued an injunction against the ban shortly after President Donald Trump announced it earlier this year.
     Last week, the judge said the injunction should stay in place at least temporarily, despite a government request to lift it.
Justice Department attorneys argued the government would suffer irreparable harm if transgender persons are allowed to be soldiers.
     They want the U.S. Supreme Court to bypass any additional appeals to take the case immediately.
     The ruling against the Justice Department last week by U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly says, “Without supporting evidence, defendants’ bare assertion that the Court’s injunction poses a threat to military readiness is insufficient to overcome the public interest in ensuring that the government does not engage in unconstitutional and discriminatory conduct.’
     “After all, it must be remembered that all plaintiffs seek during this litigation is to serve their nation with honor and dignity, volunteering to face extreme hardships, to endure lengthy deployments and separation from family and friends, and to willingly make the ultimate sacrifice of their lives if necessary to protect the nation, the people of the United States and the Constitution against all who would attack them.”

     
   







Business Briefs

Legal Briefs

Big Referral Fees
For Little Work

   Do you know someone who wants to sell a home, office or other real estate?
   If you do, you could earn thousands of dollars with a quick phone call or e-mail. The Legal Forum pays a base fee of $1,500 for referrals to sellers’ property that sells for at least $200,000. Each $100,000 of value to the property over $200,000 gives the person making the referral an extra $100. A $700,000 dollar property value, for example, would earn a referral fee of $2,000.
   Your only obligation is to phone or e-mail Tom Ramstack with the name, address, phone number or e-mail address of the seller. In most cases, it should take no more than 10 minutes of your time.
   For more information, click the Real Estate icon on the menu above or contact Tom Ramstack at 240-421-6395 or e-mail tramstack@aol.com.
   The referral fees are offered to anyone in the District of Columbia but only real estate licensees in other states. However, non-real estate agents can receive credits equal to the referral fee toward the purchase or sale of property in Virginia and Maryland.
   The brokerage for the Legal Forum is Fairfax Realty at 3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 100, Falls Church, VA 22042, phone: (703) 533-8660. 

Continue Reading...

Virginia Defense Contractors Charged
With Fraud in Afghanistan Supply Contrac
t

     Three Virginia-based defense contractors are facing charges of defrauding the government after allegedly embezzling money intended for a warehouse to supply food to U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
     Instead of building the warehouse, they lied about construction on the project, according to Justice Department documents filed last week in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
     The contractor executives, Abul Huda Farouki, Mazen Farouki and Salah Maarouf, received an $8 billion contract from the Defense Logistics Agency. Part of the contract required building a new warehouse for supplies destined to the U.S. military in Afghanistan.
     Instead, the Justice Department accuses the executives of lying about when the warehouse would be completed.
     They also are accused of taking photos of construction materials they pulled together to show the Defense Department. The photos were intended to create a false impression the warehouse was being built, according to the indictment.

Continue Reading

D.C., Maryland Attorneys General Serve
Subpoenas on Trump Organization


     Subpoenas the attorneys general of the District of Columbia and Maryland served on the Trump Organization this week demand tax documents and related financial information from the president’s corporate interests.
     If the subpoenas survive Donald Trump’s opposition, they could reveal some of the tax information the president has steadfastly refuse to release publicly.
     The D.C. and Maryland attorneys general allege in a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Maryland that Trump violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution with his local business interests, particularly Trump International Hotel in downtown Washington.
     The lawsuit says Trump is using his influence as president to drive business to the hotel, thereby depriving other nearby hotels and entertainment venues from their normal income.
     If true, the allegations appear to violate Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution that restricts members of the government from receiving “gifts, emoluments, offices or titles from foreign states and monarchies” without the consent of Congress. Emoluments generally refer to compensation for services arising from public office.

Continue Reading

Former Justice Dept. Employee in D.C.
Prosecuted in Huge Foreign Fraud Scam


     The Justice Department is seeking more than $73 million from one of its former employees and a rap artist accused of helping a Malaysian fugitive in a fraud scheme.
     Court documents filed late last week say rap artist Pras Michel and former Justice Department specialist George Higginbotham tried to funnel money and other assets through U.S. financial institutions to influence investigations of Malaysian financier Jho Low, who is sought by authorities.
     Higginbotham has pleaded guilty to one felony count of conspiracy to make false statements to a bank. He worked as a senior congressional affairs specialist at the Justice Department until August.
     Michel, 46, still is being investigated. He is the founder of the Fugees hip-hop group and is known for his 1996 remake of the song “Killing Me Softly.”
     The alleged financial scheme is centered on an investment company called 1Malaysia Development Berhad. The Malaysian government organized it as part of an economic development program.
     Justice Department officials say corrupt Malaysian government agents and businessmen misappropriated more than $4.5 billion from the company and laundered it through shell companies. Low is accused of being a kingpin in the scheme and of trying to bribe Malaysian and Abu Dhabi officials.
Continue Reading

About Us  

The Legal Forum is a news service for the Washington area's legal community that also offers job listings and grant writing for eligible nonprofits organizations. If you have questions, or you would like to place an ad, please Contact Us

Letters to the Editor

    The Legal Forum welcomes letters to the editor at tramstack@gmail.com, which will be published here.

Book on Boston Marathon Bombs
Shows Lone Wolf Terrorism Rises

   A new book that reports on the April 15, 2013 Boston Marathon bombings and trial of the convicted killer shows the attack was only an early example of more coming soon.
   Boston's Bloody Marathon uses the bombings by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother as an example of the lone wolf terrorism increasingly encouraged by Islamic extremist groups such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.
   Lone wolves refer to terrorists who plot their attacks alone, usually with no organization to support them and no official links to violent groups. There is almost no way to know their next target until they strike. U.S. intelligence agencies call them perhaps the biggest terrorist threat to the United States and its allies.
   Boston's Bloody Marathon, by Tom Ramstack, is available on Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com.
Click here.