Hotels Say Expedia Uses
Bait-and-Switch for Listings
Washington, D.C.’s The Mansion on O Street is one of the top plaintiffs in a lawsuit that accuses Expedia of a bait-and-switch scam using false advertisements and hidden reimbursements.
The Mansion on O Street is a luxury hotel in the DuPont Circle neighborhood. Expedia is a global travel technology company that aggregates airline fares and hotel fees to offer online customers the least expensive options.
A U.S. District Court judge last week granted The Mansion on O Street and other hotels certification for a class action lawsuit against Expedia.
The hotels accuse the company of advertising the best travel rates for customers but then diverting them to the websites for hotels that offer Expedia kickbacks. For hotels that do not pay kickbacks, Expedia advertises them as being sold out, according to the lawsuit.
U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said Expedia has failed to make a "meaningful attempt" to halt the false advertising when he announced the class action certification. The hotels seek an injunction against what they say is Expedia’s fraudulent online advertising.
The judge said the evidence creates questions about whether Expedia is violating the Lanham Act by misleading customers.The Lanham Act, also known as the Trademark Act of 1946, is a federal statute that governs trademarks, service marks and unfair competition.
"If the court were to determine that Expedia's messaging was misleading in violation of the Lanham Act, an injunction that required Expedia to communicate more clearly when it didn't have the power to book rooms at a given hotel may be warranted," the judge wrote.
However, the judge refused to grant class action certification to seek repayment of Expedia’s profits from alleged false advertising, saying the hotels did not explain how their damages would be calculated.
Other plaintiffs include California-based Buckeye Tree Lodge and Sequoia Village Inn, Oklahoma-based Shiloh Morning Inn and Oregon-based Prospect Historic Hotel.
Supreme Court Adopts Trump Policy
In Case of Illegal Immigrant Detentions
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that immigrants with previous criminal records can be detained without rights to bail.
The ruling is a significant victory for the Trump administration’s hardline immigration stance but one that appears to run counter to the Washington, D.C. Council’s policy of being a sanctuary city.
The decision in a lawsuit by immigrants turned on an interpretation of the detention provision in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act. The provision says noncitizens must be arrested “when [they are] released” from police custody on some criminal charges and detained without rights to bail until their deportation proceedings conclude.
A lower court ruled the mandatory detention provision applies only when noncitizens are arrested immediately after being released from custody.
“Because Congress’ use of the word ‘when’ conveys immediacy, we conclude that the immigration detention must occur promptly upon the aliens’ release from criminal custody,” says the opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco.
Book on Boston Marathon Bombs
Shows Lone Wolf Terrorism Rises
A new book that reports on the April 15, 2013 Boston Marathon bombings and trial of the convicted killer shows the attack was only an early example of more coming soon.
Boston's Bloody Marathon uses the bombings by Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and his brother as an example of the lone wolf terrorism increasingly encouraged by Islamic extremist groups such as ISIS and al-Qaeda.
Lone wolves refer to terrorists who plot their attacks alone, usually with no organization to support them and no official links to violent groups. There is almost no way to know their next target until they strike. U.S. intelligence agencies call them perhaps the biggest terrorist threat to the United States and its allies.
Boston's Bloody Marathon, by Tom Ramstack, is available on Amazon.com and Barnesandnoble.com.
The Legal Forum is a news service for the Washington area's legal community that also offers job listings and grant writing for eligible nonprofits organizations. If you have questions, or you would like to place an ad, please Contact Us
Letters to the Editor
D.C. Employee Pleads Guilty in Trading
Welfare Benefits for Sex and Cash
A D.C. government employee is awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to charges that he granted rights to $1.45 million in food stamps and welfare benefits in exchange for sex and cash from the recipients.
Demetrius McMillan, a case worker for D.C.'s Department of Human Services, accepted the sexual favors and $380,000 in cash last year from as many as 20 women, according to charging documents filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office.
McMillan, 48, pleaded guilty in federal court last week. Sentencing is scheduled for June 19.
He faces as much as 15 years in prison and a $300,000 fine. He has agreed to pay $1,456,985 in restitution, forfeit nearly $75,000 police found in his home and pay a additional fees from any court judgment.
"The crimes and acts alleged in the charging document are despicable and demonstrate a lack of values," a statement from Mayor Muriel Bowser says. "When the Department of Human Services became suspicious of illegal activity, it reported it to the Office of the Inspector General. The District government takes suspected abusive and fraudulent activity seriously and will always work and cooperate with our local and federal partners to ensure that those who engage in criminal behavior are held accountable."
The statement asks anyone who suspects waste, fraud or abuse by city officials to contact the Office of Program Review, Monitoring and Investigation.
Prosecutors are considering charges against anyone who received fraudulent public welfare benefits arranged by McMillan. They also could lose their benefits.
McMillan is the second D.C. employee in the past month to face criminal charges for welfare abuse. Former D.C. employee Gary T. Holliday was convicted last month of stealing more than $400,000 from the food stamp program and depositing it into a personal account in 2017.
Protester Projecting Light Messages
Creates Free Speech Issue on Capitol Hill
A protester awaiting trial after projecting political messages onto the wall of a Capitol Hill building last week is creating a new First Amendment free speech issue for Washington, D.C. courts.
Robby Diesu was arrested by Capitol Police after projecting a light-emitted message onto the Rayburn House Office Building.
The message said “Discrimination is wrong” as an apparent reminder to lawmakers debating the Equality Act, which would ban discrimination against the LGTBQ community. The projected light created no damage to the building.
Local and federal law forbids protests around buildings on the Capitol Grounds. Diesu and his projected message were inside the off-limits area.
He is charged with a misdemeanor for allegedly violating a regulation that bans demonstrations on the steps of “any building on Capitol Grounds or in any area otherwise closed or restricted for official use.”
D.C. in Brief
Big Referral Fees
For Little Work
Do you know someone who wants to sell a home, office or other real estate?
If you do, you could earn thousands of dollars with a quick phone call or e-mail. The Legal Forum pays a base fee of $1,500 for referrals to sellers’ property that sells for at least $200,000. Each $100,000 of value to the property over $200,000 gives the person making the referral an extra $100. A $700,000 dollar property value, for example, would earn a referral fee of $2,000.
Your only obligation is to phone or e-mail Tom Ramstack with the name, address, phone number or e-mail address of the seller. In most cases, it should take no more than 10 minutes of your time.
For more information, click the Real Estate icon on the menu above or contact Tom Ramstack at 240-421-6395 or e-mail email@example.com.
The referral fees are offered to anyone in the District of Columbia but only real estate licensees in other states. However, non-real estate agents can receive credits equal to the referral fee toward the purchase or sale of property in Virginia and Maryland.
The brokerage for the Legal Forum is Fairfax Realty at 3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 100, Falls Church, VA 22042, phone: (703) 533-8660.
The Legal Forum welcomes letters to the editor at firstname.lastname@example.org, which will be published here.
800 4th Street SW, No. N517 Washington, DC 20024
Phone: 240-421-6395 E-mail: email@example.com
Amazon’s Confidentiality Clause
Enrages Open Records Advocates
The Arlington County Board approved an incentive package for Amazon.com Saturday that includes a right for the online retailer to deny, redact or file a lawsuit to block demands for records of the county’s interactions with the company.
Amazon plans to establish an East Coast headquarters in Arlington County that is expected to bring about 25,000 mostly high-paying jobs to the Crystal City area.
Local officials offered incentives to attract Amazon that won approval last week from the Arlington County Board.
The incentive that appears to override the county’s Open Records laws is attracting concern from attorneys and civil rights activists. Open Records laws give members of the public and the media a right to view records of government meetings and transactions by filing Freedom of Information Act requests.
County officials say the provision is a confidentiality clause that is normal for economic development deals.