Supreme Court Rejects Appeal
To Grant D.C. Voting Rights
The Supreme Court last week declined to allow the District of Columbia to have a voting member of Congress in another setback for the nation’s capital to acquire many of the rights of states.
The ruling came in a lawsuit by 11 D.C. residents who argued they are being denied the constitutional rights of American citizens when they pay taxes but their congressional delegate is not allowed to vote.
Their claim of taxation without representation “violates the constitutional guarantees of equal protection, due process, and the constitutional right of association,” says the lawsuit titled Castañon et al v. United States of America.
Eleanor Holmes Norton is the District of Columbia’s only member of Congress. She holds seats on House of Representatives committees but cannot vote on any of the bills presented to lawmakers.
The Supreme Court’s summary disposition did not explain the justices’ reasoning. It said only, “On appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the judgment is affirmed.”
The plaintiffs won support from many of the same groups that support the movement for statehood of the District of Columbia. They include the ACLU, League of Women Voters, DC Vote, Neighbors United for D.C. Statehood and the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs.
The lower court decision acknowledged possible unfairness for D.C. residents who lack a voting member of Congress but added that only Congress could grant that right.
The District of Columbia is a federal district under the exclusive legislative jurisdiction of Congress. Legislative proposals to grant D.C. voting rights in Congress have been introduced in Congress several times since 1978 but never made it to a final vote.
Appeals Court Reviews Negotiated
Settlement of Attorney Discipline
The District of Columbia Bar’s disciplinary office is awaiting a decision by an appeals court on whether it has authority to negotiate lesser penalties for lawyers facing disbarment.
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is considering a case in which a lawyer is accused of "reckless misappropriation" of client funds.
His Bar license was suspended for three years. Normally misappropriation cases result in disbarment.
However, the attorney, Paul Mensah, negotiated a lesser penalty with the D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Some D.C. Bar Counsel representatives say the punishment might be too lenient.
"What is the public perception going to be if we say that, 'Here's a lawyer who has engaged in misconduct and is willing to be immediately suspended,'" Hamilton Fox, a D.C. disciplinary lawyer, told the three-judge panel. "Removing that lawyer more quickly serves the interest of the disciplinary system."
A key issue is how much discretion the Office of Disciplinary Counsel has in negotiating attorney punishments.
The Court of Appeals decision is expected to turn on a 1990 ruling of the same court that said disbarment should be the penalty for reckless or intentional misappropriation of funds unless there are "extraordinary" circumstances.
The extraordinary circumstances in Mensah’s case appear to be his remorse and attempt to make amends to his client. He was accused of misappropriating client funds in a personal injury matter and a debt collection lawsuit that settled in 2017 for $15,200.
Mensah’s attorney told the appeals court, "This case is the model for what this court wants to set forth for the Bar, knowing that he has a problem with this trust account, admits to it, owns it, has remorse, hires a bookkeeper and makes sure that everything is correct."
The case is In the Matter of: Paul T. Mensah, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 20-BG-560.
The Legal Forum welcomes letters to the editor at email@example.com, which will be published here.
Power the Civil Rights Work of Our Time
Each day members of our community are experiencing wage theft, the effects of gentrification, discriminatory policing, collateral consequences, marginalization in schools, and barriers to public accommodations.
We fight alongside people facing the effects of gentrification like Amira Moore. Our work empowers the people and communities who need it most, “We can do more than we think. There’s a path to equity, we just have to step to it.” –Ms. Moore
For more than 50 years, the Washington Lawyers’ Committee has been on the frontlines of the fight for civil rights in our community. We deploy the best legal talent, we tackle the tough cases, we fight, and we win.
Our work is as important today as it has ever been. Through your support, you can play a role in creating justice for thousands of marginalized members of our community. Together, we will dismantle injustice and pursue lasting change.
Join us! Donate & subscribe: https://www.washlaw.org/support-us
Volunteer with us: https://www.washlaw.org/get-involved/
For more information, contact Gregg Kelley at Gregg_Kelley@washlaw.org
Letters to the Editor
D.C. in Brief
D.C. Becomes Main Forum
For Vaccine Mandate Disputes
Washington, D.C. is shaping up as the prime legal battleground for vaccine mandates as a November 1 deadline approaches for all local teachers, childcare workers and some federal employees to get vaccinated or lose their jobs.
Vaccine mandates won the backing of the Supreme Court this month when Justice Sonia Sotomayor refused to block New York City's requirement that its public school teachers and employees be vaccinated against COVID-19.
Nevertheless, other anti-vaxxers are pledging to continue their resistance, even if it means starting a new career.
Ten of them filed a class action lawsuit late last month in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. They include D.C.-based military personnel, a Secret Service agent and other federal employees.
Their lawsuit seeks an injunction to block Biden administration vaccine mandates. The complaint says, “Americans have remained idle for far too long as our nation’s elected officials continue to satisfy their voracious appetites for power.”
The Legal Forum is a nonprofit news service for the Washington area's legal community that also offers attorney job listings as well as amicus briefs and grant information for charitable organizations. If you have questions, please Contact Us
800 4th Street SW, No. N517 Washington, DC 20024
Phone: 240-421-6395 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Walter Reed’s Head of Prosthetics
Sentenced for Receiving Kickbacks
The former head of prosthetics and orthotics at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is serving eight months in prison after accepting cash and gifts from a salesman seeking government contracts.
The judge also ordered David Laufer, 64, to pay nearly $8,000 in restitution. He pleaded guilty to violating his duty to avoid accepting gratuities in exchange for business, more commonly known as kickbacks.
Two other men have been convicted in the scheme that implicated Germantown-based Pinnacle Orthopedic Services. Walter Reed made more than $25 million of purchases from the company over at least four years.
The Bethesda-based hospital serves U.S. military personnel, some of them grievously wounded and needing prosthetic devices.
Part of Laufer’s job entailed selecting contractors for medical materials. They included Pinnacle.
We Could Use Your Help
Thousands of DC residents need a lawyer, but can’t afford one. They could be illegally evicted from their homes, lose custody of their children, experience domestic violence, and more, all because they lack legal representation.
You could make a difference. By making a donation to the Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia, you will provide free, high-quality, zealous legal representation to low-income DC residents. Click the photo above to make a donation today.
Your support could prevent homelessness, domestic violence, hunger, or family separation. In fact, if just 10 people who see this ad give $28 to Legal Aid, it will be enough to staff an experienced attorney at the courthouse for a day.
That way, DC residents like Keith King (pictured above) can get the legal representation they need to win their cases. As Mr. King put it, if it wasn’t for his Legal Aid lawyer, “I would have been homeless again.”
Here is the link to the Legal Aid website for donations: https://www.legalaiddc.org/donate-to-legal-aid/
For more information, contact Rob Pergament at Legal Aid at email@example.com
Supreme Court Begins New Term
With a Conservative Super-Majority
The U.S. Supreme Court started a new session last week under a cloud of suspicion that the justices might grant a windfall of decisions that favor conservatives.
Some of the criticism is coming from Congress as Democrats accuse the Court of granting too many “shadow docket” orders.
In other words, they say the Supreme Court is bypassing the need for hearings to rule on the merits of a case and instead unilaterally issuing orders.
Justice Samuel Alito responded to the allegation by calling it “very misleading.”
Nevertheless, it is taking on urgency as the Court considers major cases on abortion, gun rights and religious freedom. This term, the Court is operating with a 6-to-3 split of conservatives compared with liberals for the first time in decades.